Covid 9-11: A Softer Approach
I’m angry today. Angry and frustrated. I started out angry when I saw on the telly that they are digging up the Port Arthur story again. As tho poor Martin Bryant hasn’t been punished enough for an atrocity which he had no part in. Bryant, a kid with an IQ of 63, was a patsy. If you want proof of this you can get it from eyewitness accounts who tell of 3 separate rounds of gunfire, of body matter splattered on the ceiling and walls of the Broad Arrow Cafe, and of bullets flying from every direction at once indicating multiple shooters. I encourage everyone to do their own digging - what you will find will horrify you. A good place to start may be with the question “why was a 22 berth refrigerated morgue truck, the only one if its kind in the country, purchased a month before the massacre, and sold immediately afterwards?” If you are diligent in your research; if you dig and keep digging; if you are honest with yourself and with the evidence you uncover, you will find that Port Arthur was a paramilitary operation conducted by foreign recruits under the auspices of the Howard government, partly as a live training exercise and partly for the the purpose of enacting gun laws in Australia.
Anyway, that is just what triggered me today. It made me feel frustrated and powerless and small. I can’t explain why I react this way, I just do. For the most part I get angry at the stream of constant lies. But I also get angry for the victims, the Martin Bryants and Shapelle Corbys of this world, set up as pawns, as tho their lives mean nothing. I’m angry that the public are constantly having the wool pulled over their eyes - as tho they don’t matter either. In an ideal word I guess people wouldn’t have to question everything they are told. After all why should we? Why should anyone have to live with that sort of cynicism? Why cant we just assume we are being told the truth until it’s proven otherwise? What a safe world that would be to live in.
I don’t feel safe. Not in any aspect of my life. I sense a disjunct between the reality I perceive and the one I see reflected back at me. I feel terrified and uncertain and frustrated and mostly unable to communicate clearly why I fell this way. I feel like I’m scratching against the walls of a cage day in and day out. The most frustrating part of it is I’m really not trying to convince anyone of anything. I just want to get to the truth that’s not being told. As certain as I am that I am being lied to, I also feel desperately alone in my beliefs. I look for confirmation and validation, but above all for consensus. I feel like once we’ve arrived together at the negation of the official lie we can then press on to the affirmative. What really happened here? Who? How? When? Why? Why are we always being lied to? How do we get out of this prison of lies?
This is what I try, and I suspect mostly fail, to get across.
Sometimes it occurs to me to dial it all back, to try and take a soft approach. To at least stop for breath. To try to frame my arguments as questions rather than assertions, to start by agreeing to a common set of facts and question only the conclusions drawn from those facts. I try sometimes, but mostly I just cant. I have no interest in engaging with hypotheticals or half-truths. No interest in playing the devil’s advocate. I’d rather get to the bottom of the matter, which involves interrogating and often casting aside the starting assumptions - the foundational facts – the things we are supposed to take for granted.
Sometimes you have to work backwards. Sometimes you just need to accept, for example, that three World Trade centre buildings collapsing perfectly into their own footprints at near free-fall speed could only be achieved by a perfectly executed controlled demolition, regardless of the planes we ‘saw’ hit WTC 1 and 2. Then you need to ask who had the resources, who had site access, who held the leases, who had the security contracts, who got the $4.5 billion insurance payout, and who ultimately benefited from the 20 year Middle East regional war which followed as a direct consequence? This line of inquiry leads directly to an overwhelming conclusion – 9-11 was the work of Israeli military intelligence, with the approval of US intelligence. Once again I invite you to do your own research, or at very least consider the work of those who have already put the effort in. Chris Bollyn’s Solving 9-11 is an excellent primer. Perhaps then some follow up questions might be in order, such as: Where are the flight manifests for the hijacked planes? Why do NYC social security records not list the names of the dead? We are reminded repeatedly that 3000 people died that day. Which 3000 people? Do they include the 13 foot giants obviously photoshopped into the images from the upper storeys? The awkward mannequin ‘jumpers’ which look more like sacks of potatoes than actual people falling to their deaths? Were any actual people harmed in the making of this made-for-television docu-drama?
Why do I bring up Shapelle Corby here? Because I have no reason to doubt Allan Kessing when he says she was an innocent passenger used as an unwitting courier, that every man and his dog had access to back of house at Sydney Airport, and that drug trafficking was endemic. I am far more interested in the cover up than the alleged crime. A pertinent question would be “Who sits at the top of the drug trade in any jurisdiction?” Unlike Port Arthur and 9-11, I actually DON’T encourage people to pursue this line of investigation, because I don’t want anyone ending up like David McHugh, but as we learn from Gary Webb’s investigations into the US’ Cocaine Import Agency, it is usually the very bodies charged with policing narcotics which oversee their supply and distribution. I don’t want to infer that the Australian Federal Police may have had any direct involvement in the Schapelle Corby affair, because I don’t want to end up dead or in prison. I’d rather leave it to the reader to take a wild guess at who might have been running drugs into Bali to supply the lucrative Australian tourist market, and who might have had reason and means to cover up their involvement in the operation (including the witch hunt which found Kessing prosecuted under the Federal Crimes Act after his reports on the state of Airport Security in Sydney ended up on the front page of the Australian.) Obviously this is an uncomfortable truth which most people would rather not think about. This is perfectly understandable. We’d much prefer a comfortable lie.
When it comes to the latest story in the mainstream media, whatever it happens to be, my default position will always be extreme skepticism. I don’t think this makes me particularly conspiracy-minded. I think this is just common sense, once you understand, from an ontological perspective, what mainstream media is, how it operates, and whose interests serves. To me this is as clear as day. It is just the lens through which I see the world. A lens which is evidently not shared by the majority, in whose eyes I suffer from ‘confirmation bias’. The end result is I get angry and frustrated when I have to listen to newsreaders reciting the script of the day, regardless of the subject matter. Until you know how to read between the lines; until you understand the context behind the content, you are being manipulated.
As an example I offer something from the more mundane side of news and current affairs. Did you know that Prince Harry moved to the US to avoid the media? That is what we are being told, repeatedly. Now evaluate this claim, as it stands, then compare it with the evidence of your senses, and tell me the media is not lying to our faces. Harry and Meghan have been lapping up non-stop media attention since the big move. If you don’t get it, if you can’t see this simple disparity, then you might as well stop reading now, because nothing I have to say is worth your time. If you DO get it, then the obvious question to ask is what is it really all about? Why are the British royal family drawing so much attention? What could this possibly have to do with the ongoing ‘pandemic’ saga? More on this later maybe, but for now let me repeat – and I’ll even capitalise it for you - I DON’T BELIEVE A SINGLE WORD THE MEDIA SAYS, ABOUT ANYTHING. They are either directly lying, or presenting selected half-truths in order to mislead. That is what they do. That is, in fact, their job. To push an agenda. The agenda of the private interests which they serve.
Did you think their job was to investigate and report the news? Real investigative journalists don’t appear on the six o’clock news. Real investigative journalists end up like David McHugh, beaten to death for his part in exposing the Schapelle Corby cover-up, or like Gary Webb, shot TWICE in the back of the head, his death ruled suicide by the coroner’s court, just to bring the point home. Real investigative journalists spend years holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London before being locked up in Belmarsh. (Sidebar: Is it just coincidence that Assange and Wikileaks were taken out of play right before Act 1 of the pandemic saga?) Real investigative journalists die in car bomb attacks or from sudden unexplained heart attacks. The six o’clock news is ENTERTAINMENT, or as Zappa put it, the entertainment arm of the military industrial complex.
The same can be said for politicians. They serve a certain set of interests, and those interests are not the electorate. Representative democracy is a FARCE. The job of politicians is to preserve the social order. Which may sound obvious and even naive, until you understand what is meant by social order. Its quite simple really. Rich and powerful at the top, poor and ‘non-essential’ at the bottom. It is the same for the media, in fact for all instruments and institutions of state and civil society. They defend the interests of capital, of property, of the rich and powerful. The one thing they do not defend is your natural rights, be that the right to privacy, free speech, or bodily autonomy.
What interest would they possibly have in telling you the truth? They lie constantly, about everything. Whether they know they are lying or whether they just know who butters their bread makes scant difference, they still lie. We are used to shonky salesmen lying to us, that’s just part of life. But priests also lie, when they say you are going to hell if live in sin, if you don’t take the eucharist, or if you don’t give your money to the church. Politicians lie when they tax your income and tell you it is to pay for public spending; when they tell you that the armed forces are serving abroad to protect your freedom. Judges lie when they lock you up over a bag of weed and tell you it’s for the safety of society. Teachers lie when they tell you you need to learn your multiplication tables by rote in order to get a good job. Much of what is taught as ethics is in fact just a body of lies which perpetuates the social order – early to bed, early to rise, do as you’re told, respect your elders, obey the law. Big at the bottom, small at the top, as tho that is the right way to build ANYTHING. Ask any kid whose ever played with building blocks, but I digress…
Similarly when it comes to the Covid saga, we have been sold a bill of goods. Covid 19 is a bag of lies from start to finish. There was never a deadly virus. All cause mortality for 2020 was the 9th highest since 2000. That is to say, about average. There were no more overall deaths than in an average year, despite the horrors of lockdown. Presumably the extra suicides were balanced out by fewer car accidents, but there is nothing to indicate anything worse than a normal flu year. How will 2021 rank by comparison, with millions having now received the much celebrated ‘jab’?
The vaccines they are now demanding we all take are neither safe and effective, nor even necessary when there is evidence to show that we have already achieved 50% herd immunity. In fact it seems these vaccines are far from safe. At the time of writing in the US alone there have been over 4500+ deaths reported to VAERS. 63 of those deaths have been children under 3 years old. In 1976 they stopped the rollout of the swine flu vaccine after 25 deaths because the risk was considered too great. And yet there are no moves to stop the rollout of these experimental toxins which are still in phase 3 testing until 2023. That means they are supposed to be the subject of double blind tests. There is supposed to be a control group given a placebo. But guess what? The BMJ reports that testing was unblinded as of April 13, with placebo recipients now able to receive the actual vaccine. So I guess that means phase 3 trials have now been abandoned.
Regardless of what any politician or media personality says, the fact is that these so-called vaccines are experimental drugs which have been approved for emergency use only. NEWSFLASH: Using people in medical experiments without their INFORMED CONSENT is a crime for which Nazi doctors were hung at the Nuremberg trials. And there is no informed consent. In fact quite the opposite is happening, with a growing list of professionals and experts from the fields of epidemiology, general practice and law now having their reputations smeared and social media accounts shut down for speaking out.
Bloomberg now says freely and openly that we may have to force people to take the vaccines. You read that right, A prominent liberal media outlet is now advocating for the forced use of an untested medical intervention for which there is no long term data and which is known to cause serious deliterious side effects, on the entire population including infants.
At what point do we wake up and realise what is going on here is not a response to a public health crisis, but rather a Nazi style eugenics program? At what point do we say enough is enough? At what point do we decide, collectively, that every politician, celebrity and talking head who has ever repeated the phrase “safe and effective” needs to be taken out into the public square, strung up by their private parts, covered in vaseline and petrol and set alight?
I’m sorry it took me so long to get to my point, but there you have it. That is my soft approach. My weakest position. My bare minimum. The Covid 19 conspiracy is the greatest deception in a generation and a crime against humanity against which 9-11 and the so-called War on Terror pale in comparison. Its perpetrators are genocidal maniacs who deserve to be burned alive.
*deep breath*
I’m waiting for validation now.