Covid 9-11: Jenga Towers and Giant Dicks.

We stand in the shadow of a tower of insurmountable contradictions, or maybe surmountable ones. Or is it a leaning tower of contradictions? I don’t know. The idea that our current malaise may have something to do with the uneven settling of an edifice of propaganda in the soft ground of the human psyche is something I could maybe work with, but it sounds a bit apologetic for our present purposes. A friend described the situation to me the other day as being analogous to a Jenga tower - because the lies so often contradict each other, each one has to be carefully removed and replaced with the next. I’m not even sure if that is how it works to be honest, but I like it enough to use it in the title of this piece.

Metaphors aside, everywhere we look today there are contradictions in the government and media messaging. When there are two contradictory positions, logic dictates that of them must be false. So which one is it?

How did we go from 15 days to flatten the curve to being locked in our homes indefinitely? How did we go from ‘we’re all in this together’, to a superhuman class of grandiose narcissists posting pics of their deltoids on the socials, while the subhuman unvaxxed or god forbid unmasked aren’t even permitted to go to a chemist (pharmacist), or shop for food?

For most of last year we heard that the suspension of democracy would end once we had a vaccine. At the same time we were assured that our personal health information would always be private, that proof of vaccination would never be required for work, going to the pub or the theatre or dining in a restaurant, and that vaccine passports were just a ‘conspiracy theory’. On arrival of the vaccines this narrative began to shift, and now it seems that access to public life will only be restored for those who have proof of vaccination via some sort of digital certificate.

A year ago they told us vaccines would never be mandatory. Now they are not only saying that everyone must get jabbed in order to return to normal life, but threatening to deploy the armed forces door to door to enforce this mandate.

While much of this is being pushed by the private sector, with huge employers such as Google now demanding that all their employers be vaccinated, governments are also mandating that all who work in ‘public facing’ roles receive their jabs, beginning with aged care. Meanwhile Canada appears to be the first place to have banned entry into the country without proof of vaccination

A year ago they told us that the vaccines would protect us from the virus. Six months ago this position was revised and we were told that vaccines offered limited immunity and may help to reduce symptoms, but still everyone needed to get the injection. Today it is confirmed that Covid-19 infections and deaths are rising and that the majority of deaths are occurring among the vaccinated. Indeed some of the highest rates of the disease are found in countries with the highest rates of vaccination, with more than half of those now hospitalised in Israel and the UK being fully vaccinated.

Are these contradictions that we can easily gloss over? Is it simply a matter of new facts coming to light, to which we must adapt our world view? Or is it lies being piled up on top of lies, on top of lies?

Knowns and unknowns.

At a time when institutional trust is reportedly at its lowest, the amount of resistance to legitimate questioning is genuinely alarming. The general population seems to be so traumatised that anyone who dares to point out the obvious flaws in the official narrative is seen to be pushing the guard rails. “Experts all agree” they proclaim, but when you mention the names of experts who clearly do not agree, they are “a small minority of outliers and naysayers”. Even when these naysayers are leading epidemiologists from the world’s most prestigious medical research institutions.

Trying to make the case for conspiracy is exasperating. And yet there is so much evidence which clearly points to it. So rather than speculate further, perhaps a more useful approach might be to compare some of the knowns and unknowns, and see where we land. What claims can we make which we know are epistemologically sound? What claims have a basis in observable, provable fact? What can we say with absolute certainty?

Cases Numbers.

In what would normally be a bombshell announcement, the CDC has withdrawn it’s emergency use application for the use of PCR testing to detect the SARS CoV-2 virus. This should be unsurprising to anyone who has looked into the polymerase chain reaction process, how and why it was developed and the way in which it is being presently applied.

PCR is a powerful manufacturing process designed to generate a useful assay from a tiny sample of DNA by making billions of copies. The more amplification cycles, the greater the size of the assay. When the cycle threshold is in the range of 40 to 45, it is possible to find fragments of just about anything. This is great for forensics, but not so great for detecting the presence or pathogenicity of an infectious agent, since it can return a high percentage of ‘false positives’. In the case of SARS CoV-2, PCR testing at inappropriate cycle thresholds generates a large number of ‘cases’, but quite often these ‘cases’ are perfectly healthy people who do not manifest the clinical symptoms of Covid-19. I.E, they are neither symptomatic nor infectious.

Sidebar: What happened to antibody tests? When did we stop using serology as the ‘gold standard’? When did diagnosis without clinical presentation become a thing? Why has testing been outsourced to pop-up tents in car parks rather than hospitals, surgeries and medical centres?

Number of deaths

An alarming trend became apparent early into the pandemic, with anecdotal reports of people who had died from a range of other causes having Covid-19 listed on their death certificates – heart attacks, car accidents, or falling out of a tree within 28 days of a positive test result could be classed as a Covid death. Neither were co-morbidities taken into consideration in the death toll calculus. For example, if a person with stage 4 cancer died with a Covid diagnosis, they were counted as a Covid death. The question ignored is, did the person die from covid, or with Covid. Here we see the selective application of the post hoc ergo propter hoc principle (Y happened after X, therefore Y happened because of X.) Compare this with deaths following vaccine injury, often within a 72 hour window, which are being reported in their tens of thousands, and yet not attributed to the vaccines.

When factors such as monocausal diagnosis and reliability of testing are taken into account, the actual number of Covid infections and deaths becomes an unknown.

What we can determine with a high degree of accuracy however is all-cause mortality. The total number of deaths over a given period is generally searchable in public databases, and usually up-to-date as of the last 90 days. Looking at worldwide all-cause mortality for the year 2020 we find that it is the 9th highest since 2000. That puts it just below average. That is to say, the total number of deaths recorded last year was within the expected range, despite a raging deadly pandemic.

This small piece of information we can class as known.

Variants

“NBC News, citing unnamed officials aware of the decision, reported it comes after new data suggests vaccinated individuals could have higher levels of virus and infect others amid the surge of cases driven by the delta variant of the coronavirus,” - USA Today (since removed).

The latest twist in the Covid narrative involves the mutation of the virus into ‘variants’ of its original ‘Alpha’ strain. We’re told to accept this as fact. But has this fact been tested? With PCR testing unable to distinguish between flu and SARS CoV-2, one might legitimately wonder how these variants are being detected, or if it is simply the case that variant X has been posited, therefore any new case is considered variant X. Is there any actual proof that these new so-called variants actually exist? Have any samples of Alpha, Delta, Lambda etc been isolated in a laboratory? Or are they just theoretical models? And if they do exist, then what is their pathogenesis? Are they occurring in the wild? (I.E. among the unvaccinated) Or are they the result of secondary spread due to pathogenic priming among the vaccinated? At this point the origins and even the existence of Delta, Lambda etc strains seems to be an unknown.

Masks

Messaging around the efficacy of mask wearing has changed from day one of the pandemic. At first masks were said to be ineffective and not recommended for use by the general public. And yet somehow by the end of 2020 they were generally mandated. We know that cloth masks have zero efficacy against the spread of a viral infection, either by aerosol or droplet. We know that masks can cause psychological trauma, particularly in infants who take most of their learning cues from facial expression, but also in the general population. We know that masks are contra-indicated for people with breathing difficulties including conditions such as asthma, emphysema or COPD. And yet, despite the health advice, masks are now mandated for everyone, everywhere, including outdoors. One might wonder if this is really about public health, or merely compliance?

What is in the vaccines?

Finally an easy question to answer. The vaccines are commercial property and are therefore covered under intellectual property law. We are not allowed to know what is in them, apart from what their manufacturers choose to disclose. The fact sheets unsurprisingly contain little information, even compared to an aspirin.

We do know however that these vaccines at the very least have been rushed onto the market. We know that a process which normally takes up to 10 years was completed in less than six months. We know that all currently available vaccines are still in phase 3 safety trials until early 2023. And we know that the injectables marketed by Pfizer and Moderna – two of the pack leaders - while meeting the broad definition of a medical device, are not biological in nature and do not guarantee immunity, therefore do not meet the legal definition of vaccines.

We know from the Linkdin profiles, the white papers, the patent applications, the funding documents and the company mission statements that Big Pharma wants to fundamentally change the way in which medicine is delivered, from the cradle to the grave. mRNA technology represents a radically new medical paradigm. A one-size fits all approach to treating all genetic deviation via injectables. The marketing slogan “hacking the software of life” should be enough to make a rational person think twice about these injections. Alas traumatised people seldom make rational choices.

We know despite the claims that pharma companies make little from vaccines, that vaccines are in fact a billion dollar industry. Case in point Moderna, which in 2019 was worth $5bn, and today is worth over $100bn.

Safety and efficacy

“So the key message from our findings is that we’ve found recipients of the Pfizer vaccine, those who’ve had two doses, have about five to sixfold lower amounts of neutralising antibodies – now these are the sort of gold standard private security antibodies of your immune system which block the virus from getting into your cells in the first place.” - David LV Bauer, Francis Crick Institute

With the paper of record now openly admitting that the vaccinated can spread the Delta variant and will need boosters, the future according to Big Pharma becomes crystal clear. Once on the mRNA treadmill there is no getting off. This also happens to be the culmination of Anthony Fauci’s life’s work - to deliver a universal influenza vaccine and get it into the arms of everyone, everywhere, for life.

We have been repeatedly bombarded by media messaging stating that these vaccines are ‘safe and effective’. And yet we have official reports from public bodies established to monitor vaccine adverse events which patently contradict this claim.

The US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports that between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 16 2021 there have been 491,218 adverse events, including 11,405 deaths, 30,781 hospitalisations, 59,402 urgent care cases, 82,535 office visits, 2,487 cases of anaphylaxis and 2,885 cases of Bell’s palsy due to the vaccine. The number of deaths and injuries approximately doubles when we look at reporting for the European Database of Suspected Drug Reaction, with similar reports coming from the UK and Canada. Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration reports over 40,000 post-vaccine adverse reactions and 377 deaths, with 6 of these directly attributed. One wonders how the distinction between correlation and causation can be made when a person dies within 72 hours of receiving a poisonous injection. Personally knowing someone who works in ambulance dispatch, I can confirm that the rate of vaccine injury and death is alarming. More worrying is that this information is being suppressed because people are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their jobs.

State of emergency

At the beginning of the pandemic we were told it was a medical emergency. Apart from the obvious use of emergency powers to coerce, intimidate and bully the general population, this framing has been used to justify the emergency use authorisation of a medical intervention which is still in the clinical trial phase and for which there is no mid to long term safety data. This emergency use authorisation depended on certain preconditions being met. One of these was that there be no other alternate treatments available.

This emergency use authorisation still obtains despite a peer reviewed study by Bryant and Lawrie published in the American Journal of Therapeutics stating that:

“15 trials found that Ivermectin reduced the risk of death by 62% in 2438 patients”, and “Ivermectin prophylaxis reduced Covid 19 infections by an average of 86%.”

Despite a report from the Australian National Covid 19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce stating:

“Evidence comes from 13 randomised trials in over 1260 adults… showing a 67% reduction in death for those administered Ivermectin for Covid, and a 46% reduction in ICU admissions.”

And despite many studies pointing to the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc and vitamin C in treating Covid-19, as well as a range of other off-the-shelf treatments.

That there is a plethora of proven safe and effective treatments available for Covid 19 is a known fact which contradicts the preconditions for the mandated use of an experimental gene therapy in response to a declared medical emergency. It is also, however, an inconvenient fact when one considers the contractual agreements governments have with the vaccine manufacturers.

“(b)Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that (i) Pfizer’s efforts to develop and manufacture the Product are aspirational in nature and subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and (ii) the fact that any other drug or vaccine to prevent, treat or cure COVID-19 infection is successfully developed or granted authorization earlier than the granting of Authorization for the Product shall not change the current situation of urgent needs for prevention of the spread of the COVID-19 infection that poses serious threats to and harmful effects on the lives and health of the general public.”

The general gist here is that governments need to pay for the vaccines, whether or not they work, whether or not there are other effective treatments available, and with no recourse for injury or failure. The vaccine companies are fully indemnified, have absolutely nothing to lose, and stand to make billions, while the taxpayer is left with the bill. With vaccines and booster shots all the way out to the far horizon, it’s hard not to think that a few shrewd investors might be rubbing their hands together right now.

Plan-demic?

We know, without ascribing intention or pointing the finger of blame, that precisely such a global pandemic had been planned for. Indeed a tabletop planning and preparedness exercise billed as Event 201 took place on the very day that patient zero is said to have contracted the virus in Wuhan, China, on October 18, 2019.

Surprisingly (or unsurprisingly) this planning event made little mention of treatments or medicines or public health in general, but rather focused in great detail on managing media messaging, on trust in government, on supply chain integrity, on population control and movement restrictions, and on the acceptance of a universal vaccine mandate. We know that this planned pandemic response has been followed to the letter, with arguably little or no regard for actual pubic health. We know it has been the pandemic response, rather than the pandemic itself, which has dealt a severe economic blow to small businesses and seen a massive transfer of market share to large corporations.

We know that regulatory capture is a thing that exists. We know that the same billionaires who invest in pharma companies also fund the public health bureaucracy through ‘philanthropy’. We know that corporations make political donations and that politicians often find themselves, at the end of their political careers, sitting on the boards of those same corporations, or employed in ‘diplomatic roles’, receiving fat pay cheques to give advice to government agencies on behalf of those same corporations. This phenomena is encapsulated in the euphemism ‘the revolving door’, or in common parlance, corruption.

We know that case numbers continue to be inflated, resulting in more draconian and authoritarian restrictions being imposed on the gen pop. We know that asymptomatic (aka, healthy) people are being advised, sometimes ordered, to get tested, based on contact tracing (aka digital surveillance.) We know that this guarantees more cases by simple virtue of the testing method. We know that a case does not necessarily mean a sick or infectious person, nonetheless each report of increased ‘cases’ in the daily news cycle intensifies trauma in the gen pop. We know the Covid death rate is also inflated due to monocausal diagnosis (but still remains low compared to a normal flu season.) We know that people are dying from the injections and that these injections are by definition neither safe nor effective, but are in fact poisons. We know and have been warned about pathogenic priming and the risk of secondary spread. We know that there are safe and effective treatments which have been actively suppressed. We know that a global pandemic response was prepared in 2019 and that we are seeing all of its recommendations put in place. We know that in the middle of this global pandemic response, millions are losing their homes, businesses and livelihoods, while billionaires are riding giant dicks into space.

Finally, we know that anyone who even dares suggest there might be more going on here than meets the eye is censored, de-platformed, ridiculed and scorned.

I’m not suggesting that this is all a conspiracy. I’m just pointing out some of the knowns and unknowns. The rest is for you to decide.