Moloch whose love is endless oil and stone! Moloch whose soul is electricity and banks! Moloch whose poverty is the specter of genius! Moloch whose fate is a cloud of sexless hydrogen! Moloch whose name is the Mind!
Moloch! Moloch! Robot apartments! invisible suburbs! skeleton treasuries! blind capitals! demonic industries! spectral nations! invincible madhouses! granite cocks! monstrous bombs!
~ Allen Ginsberg, Howl
In 2018 the Vatican came under fire for erecting a statue of Moloch at the gates of the Colosseum. While the ministry of truth tells us this story is ‘missing context’, one wonders in what possible context the Papacy could give its blessing to the erection of an effigy of the ancient Babylonian god of child sacrifice without at least raising a few eyebrows. Then again, if child sacrifice was meant to appease the gods in time of famine or pestilence, then the figure of a bull headed idol with arms outstretched over a fire is probably as relevant to the current historical moment as ever.
Before I continue, I should make make it clear I’m not aligned in any way with the Q movement, and do not take a partisan approach when it comes to the issue of child trafficking and abuse. God knows there is enough evidence out there that this sort of thing is endemic among the ruling class, and it certainly isn’t restricted to one side of the political spectrum. We learned this much recently from the Epstein case. When it comes to corruption and depravity, the political divide is non-existent.
It’s more or less commonly known nowadays that the late English DJ, television and radio personality Jimmy Savile used to procure young boys from orphanages who would be taken out on his luxury yacht for members of the British aristocracy - including a former Prime minister - to enjoy before being disposed of. Funny that this sort of information rarely makes its way into public discourse, as tho quarantined somehow from our social awareness by an invisible veil, or at least thrown into the too hard basket.
In case you tuned out and missed what I just said, Edward Heath, a former British Prime Minister, used to FUCK LITTLE BOYS AND THEN KILL THEM FOR SPORT, and the public is largely OK with this. At least, we let it slide. Pushing it aside to scratch away at the remaining shreds of our critical thought processes while we indulge in whatever distraction the media serves up, and causing what is known in psychology as cognitive dissonance – a feeling of mental discomfort arising from holding two sets of conflicting beliefs. In the one case, the belief that humans are basically good, that the law is there for our protection, that he ruling class have earned their right to rule, that Bill gates is a philanthropist who wants to eliminate child poverty - insert whatever myth you like into the blank space. On the other side is the certain knowledge that we are ruled over by psychopaths and peadophiles.
The fact that the knowledge of elite paedophilia can lurk in the back of our consciousness without making us physically sick seems to indicate to me some sort of mental conditioning. Somehow, god knows how, we just accept that it happens and get on with our lives. We certainly don’t see anyone marching in the streets about it. In fact those who dare bring it up it are generally dismissed as ‘conspiracy theorists’, despite an overwhelming body of evidence proving the case. There are only two possible ways to react to this body of evidence. We either accept it, and the logical conclusions to which it leads, or we ignore it and continue on our way, thus becoming complicit in the crime. Complicit, in a sense, in our own abuse.
Is it possible to imagine a greater evil than child sexual abuse? I guess for those incapable of even accepting that this sort of thing goes on, that would be a resolute no. But what if I told you today we could be witnessing psychopathic ritual abuse on a much larger scale? A sacrifice on the altar of ‘science’ involving the entire human species?
I’ve argued before that the ruling class share a unifying ideology. They believe themselves to be superior; more deserving than the rest of us simply in virtue of their status. A kind of ‘manifest destiny’ I guess. They are destined to be the most wealthy and powerful simply because they are, never mind the systemic, structural methodology through which their power is reproduced. To put it simply, when you place power and wealth above all else, it comes back to bite you on the tail. Hierarchy is socially reproduced because we actively participate in it, every time we obey their laws, pay their taxes, vote in their ‘elections’, endorse their latest celebrity or buy their latest advertised product. It’s not metaphysics, it’s not natural philosophy, it’s an historical, material process.
The end result of this process is that we have billionaires like Bill Gates and royal parasites like the late Prince Philip honestly believing they’d be doing the planet a tremendous service by ridding it of the great mass of the human population. God knows we are surplus to their needs now, what with artificial intelligence and automated production displacing human labour at a rate not seen since the invention of the Jacquard loom, and as they keep reminding us, there simply aren’t enough resources for all of us to go on living in the, err, manner to which we are accustomed.
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to come back as a deadly virus, so as to contribute to solving overpopulation” - H.R.H. Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
The study of genetically enhanced disease pathogens for application in biological warfare is a well documented fact. It’s also doing the rounds in the media lately, with China being tacitly accused in some quarters of unleashing the deadly ‘Wuhan virus’ in a bid to secure world domination. As though it hasn’t been ceded this status already through 40 years of US trade policy, but I digress... Yes it seems quite possible, even likely, that COVID-19 was deployed as a bio-weapon, or at very least taken advantage of to pursue pre-existing ambitions. Furthermore it appears almost certain that the research which led to the virus originated in a US bio-security lab and was sent to China for completion after a moratorium was placed on gain-of-function experiments. But casting blame as to which side is responsible for creating the ‘pandemic’ avoids a crucial point: Biological weapons are indeed a reality, and have been in use for decades, if not centuries (smallpox, anyone?) Airborne pathogens however, are for amateurs. Mostly because they are unpredictable and unreliable. And anyway who needs them, when you have an entire population under hypnosis, addicted to their television screens, terrified into submission by whichever phantom you wish to project this week, and ready to roll up their sleeves to receive whatever concoction you want to inject them with?
From The Salk Institute for Biological Studies: “Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself.”
Do they just?
Here we have one of the world’s leading research institutes telling us in no uncertain terms that the SARS CoV-2 spike protein is pathogenic and causes disease - the very same spike protein which the mRNA ‘vaccines’ are designed to create in human immune cells. Perhaps this spike protein does “behave very differently” when “encoded by the vaccine”, but what about in the wild? Wouldn’t this effectively turn inoculated persons into vectors of transmission as they begin to shed ‘virus’, or in this case ‘vaccine’ particles? What an ingenious way to deploy a bio-weapon. ‘Problem, reaction, solution’ anyone?
The idea of self-propagating vaccines has been in the works for some time, according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
“In the event of a grave public health threat, self-spreading vaccines could potentially be used to broadly inoculate human populations. Like the approach in animals, only a small number of vaccinated individuals would be required in order to confer protection to a larger susceptible population, thus eliminating the need for mass vaccination operations”
This has not surprisingly been met with considerable resistance, not least because it violates the principle of informed consent. “In the case of self-spreading vaccines, the individuals directly vaccinated would have this option, but those to whom the vaccine subsequently spreads would not”.
Does that mean they wouldn’t do it?
Given that what is proposed here is all quite feasible, and given the ruling class’ absolute sense of entitlement (not to mention penchant for genocide), one could be forgiven for asking whether this is what we are seeing right now . One might even ask - with a nod to the first lady of jazz - How long has this been going on?
This line of inquiry seems to raise at least as many questions as it purports to answer. What if this isn’t their first rodeo? Covid-19 was initially observed to disproportionately affect people who had recently received a flu shot. What if SARS CoV-2 was never an airborne pathogen to begin with? What if people who received their annual flu jab in 2019 or early 2020 were injected with self amplifying RNA designed to inoculate the non-innoculated? What if this was the original cause of the so-called pandemic?
This would certainly put paid to the ongoing debate over whether SARS CoV 2 is a naturally occurring or man made virus. What if it’s not a virus at all, but rather a side effect of an earlier vaccine? What if we’re all part of an insane, recursive medical experiment to see whether a small number of vaccinated subjects could confer mass vaccination on the larger population by proxy? Never mind the potential risks such as blood clots, allergies and auto-immune conditions. More importantly, never mind the basic principle of informed consent.
The biggest question of all though seems to be, how do we differentiate between a self replicating vaccine and a self replicating disease pathogen? Could they in fact be one and the same? Let's be clear. What we are talking about here is hacking the human immune system and turning it into a factory to mass produce something which could potentially achieve wild type virulence, for which there may be no actual cure or treatment. It’s a terrifying thought. But then, we live in an age where elite child sexual abuse is basically tolerated without much of a fuss, so why should a little Nazi-style eugenics cause any great kerfuffle?
Very thought provoking. I assume the evilite are evil so think it is best to presume the worst. We should act accordingly and work together on how to best neutralize the threat.